Training the next generation
of lawyers.
Training the next generation of lawyers as trusted advisors.
Enter the Practicum — Explore the ScenariosJohn O. Sonsteng · Damien Riehl · Roger S. Haydock · Hosted by Damien Riehl · content CC BY 4.0 · code MIT
Law school teaches about law. It rarely teaches lawyering.
Graduates know doctrine, but the profession still must teach them how to serve a client.
THE PROOF · 19,077 attorneys surveyed
For fifty years, the Legal Practicum scholarship has documented a stubborn gap: graduates emerge fluent in doctrine yet unprepared to practice — to interview a client, take a deposition, negotiate, try a case. The scholarship didn't merely assert it; the Minnesota skills survey measured it. A 53-question instrument went to 19,077 Minnesota attorneys; 1,398 responded, scoring each skill for importance against how prepared law school left them. The verdict was consistent, and unflattering — the evidence is below.
The remedy has always been known — repetition, performance, and immediate expert critique (the apprenticeship the trades never abandoned). It simply never scaled: one master can only watch so many reps. That is the constraint AI just removed.
It does not train students to be lawyers.A Legal Education Renaissance (2007)
Midstate and Rogers: one matter, the whole method.
Pat Rogers and SPEU enter an employment arbitration with Midstate. Students develop the record, question witnesses, negotiate, draft, argue, receive critique, and revise — the practicum in one case.
THE PROOF · ~1,438 assessed points
Every course runs a three-step cycle
Faculty Supervised Study I
Independent pre-work — texts, casebooks, prepared materials. Competence is checked with short papers, essays, or an oral exercise before the room convenes.
Intensive Residential Practicum
The core: face-to-face, small-group, faculty-guided real-world simulation. The reps that only happen live — argument, negotiation, trial.
Faculty Supervised Study II
A comprehensive applied assessment integrating the prep and the practicum — memos, problem discussion, the redlined re-write against the rubric.
The matters — twenty complete case files
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Gregor A. Winterhalt, a Meridian Attorney
Attorney discipline6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterLorraine Petimeyer v. Douglas Ashcombe
Auto-negligence jury trial6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterIn re Purchase of 4400 Kestrel Point, Sable County (Renard–Meskin)
Real-estate purchase negotiation6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterState of Meridian v. Devon R. Halvard
Criminal DWI5 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterNorthlake Surgical Instruments, Inc. v. Adaeze Okwuosa
Non-compete / trade secrets6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterCloverdyke Dairy Cooperative v. Brandt Refrigeration Systems, LLC
UCC sale-of-goods dispute6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterIn re the Welfare of T.M., a Minor
Juvenile delinquency5 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterIn re the Marriage of Renata Sitko and Harlan Aldergrove
Marriage dissolution5 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterIn re the Estate of Mabel R. Thornquist
Wills & probate contest6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterPrairie State Logistics, Inc. v. Yusuf Adeyemi (Employment Arbitration)
Employment arbitration6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Delphine A. Karsgaard, a Minnesota Attorney
Attorney discipline6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterSofia Reyes v. Bradley Hutchins
Auto-negligence jury trial6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterIn re Purchase of the Cimarron Tract (Whitfield–Nakamura)
Real-estate purchase negotiation6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterState of Minnesota v. Travis O. Wenzloff
Criminal DWI6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterHudson Valley Biometrics, Inc. v. Priya Iyer
Non-compete / trade secrets6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterEmpire Provisions Corp. v. Ostervold Packing Co.
UCC sale-of-goods dispute6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterIn re J.C., a Minor (Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 602)
Juvenile delinquency5 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterIn re the Marriage of Camille Beaumont and Andre Lassiter
Marriage dissolution5 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterIn re the Estate of Harold W. Prewitt
Wills & probate contest6 mapped skillsSuggested lengths: One week · Three weeks · Full semesterOpen matterEight representation agreements, eight client billing statements fed by weekly time sheets, briefs, pleadings, and thirteen time sheets all carry points. The seam the Centaur plugs into: any piece scored below 6 may be re-written within a week against the same rubric — the profession's rubric-and-repeat loop, waiting only for feedback to become instant and infinite.
The skills that make a lawyer — and the ones school forgets.
The widest gaps are in the practical skills clients and firms depend on every day.
THE PROOF · 70-point client-development gap
The Minnesota skills survey named the work of a practicing lawyer precisely: 17 legal-practice skills and 9 law-practice-management skills. For each, the survey asked the same four questions — is it important, were you prepared, could it be learned in school, and where did you actually learn it. Every skill was rated important. Most could be taught in school. Yet law-school curriculum was the leading source of training for only 7 of the 17 practice skills — and for none of the 9 management skills.
Importance vs. preparedness — the seven widest gaps
And the management blackout
A law practice is a business — yet law school is credited as the leading trainer for none of the 9 management skills. Where curriculum shows up at all, it is in the low single digits: billing 7.9%, marketing 3.9%, capitalization 2.3%.
All 26 skills matter. School leads on seven.The 2018–19 Minnesota study · one of a longitudinal series (1997–99 · 2013 · 2018–19)
Fifty years, three acts, one argument.
THE PROOF · diagnosis, method, and open resource
A Legal Education Renaissance
The diagnosis. A practical, client-centered model for 21st-century legal education — the manifesto the profession cited but never fully built.
The Legal Practicum Method
The solution, proven in a live classroom: the General Practice Skills Practicum — a working-law-firm simulation with real reps, memos, and assessed advocacy.
The Open Resource Tool
Open-access exercises & case files (Trialbook; the "Midstate" jurisdiction), run jointly by Mitchell Hamline's C-LAB and IGUL at Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul.
The team — and the first centaur — already exist.Trialbook — a text and AI platform (Trialbook GPT · Opal)
The Legal Education Renaissance cost model is the disarming part: convert half the tenure-track lines to long-term teaching faculty and a school can hire ~two teachers for every line replaced — tripling teaching time at the same or lower cost. AI first-pass assessment (Act V) then pushes capacity well past even that.
Compare delivery cost per credit with your institution’s own figures →
What the Magnum Opus is.
THE PROOF · 3 layers, 1 open whole
The Book
A canonical treatise consolidating the Legal Practicum scholarship — including restoration of the crown-jewel articles now surviving only as degraded scans. The intellectual core, made permanent.
The Curriculum
The Skills Practicum, structured into teachable modules — skills, exercises, rubrics, and the Midstate case files — so any instructor, anywhere, can run it.
The Platform
AI-assisted delivery that finally scales the 1:1 apprenticeship — unlimited reps, instant critique, human judgment where it counts. The living opus.
Human + AI. Neither alone.
The apprenticeship works because of expert critique. AI doesn't replace the expert — it multiplies the reps and handles the first pass, so the master's scarce attention lands where only judgment will do.
THE PROOF · 24/7 first-pass critique
The Rep
The student performs — a cross, a memo, a negotiation, an argument — as many times as they want, on demand.
StudentInstant Critique
AI assesses against the rubric in seconds: what worked, what didn't, what to try next. Unlimited, 24/7, judgment-free reps.
AI · scalesThe Coaching
Human faculty spend their scarce hours on what machines can't teach: judgment, ethics, strategy, presence — the "why."
Faculty · anchorsIllustrative — a single rep
Every skill — taught, improved, and amplified.
The curriculum is designed backward from the whole job, so no practical competency is left to chance.
THE PROOF · all 26 skills mapped
The survey named the whole job — 17 practice skills, 9 management skills — and showed school leading on only seven. The Practicum is designed backward from that list: every one of the 26 skills has a home in an exercise, a stage in the teaching cycle, and a human-anchored AI amplification. Nothing is assumed; each skill is assessed work.
The method below is documented in the Legal Practicum articles and the live Skills Practicum. The improvements and the AI amplification are our proposed layer over that proven method — never a replacement for it.
The 17 legal-practice skills — where the curriculum puts each one
The 9 management skills — the blackout school leads on none of — live in cluster F below: the working-firm overlay of agreements, time sheets, and billing.
Across analysis, research, fact investigation, writing, oral advocacy, negotiation, counseling, firm management, and professional responsibility, the method keeps doctrine attached to live matters. AI adds private practice reps, verified research, rubric-anchored redlines, varied counterparties, and issue spotting; faculty retain judgment, ethics, strategy, and presence.
School leads on seven. The Practicum — human-anchored, AI-amplified — reaches all twenty-six.The Legal Practicum method, faithfully extended · the improvements & AI are the proposed layer
Given away, so it outlives us.
Open licensing lets every school adopt, adapt, and strengthen the work.
THE PROOF · CC BY 4.0 content + MIT code
The practicum is open by design: defined original educational content is available under CC BY 4.0, while the software remains MIT-licensed. The exact content boundary, attribution form, and exclusions are in CONTENT-LICENSE.md. A movement to remake how lawyers are trained can't be locked in a paywall — it has to be free to copy, adapt to any jurisdiction, and improve.
Open also compounds: every school that adopts it adds exercises, critiques, and data back to the commons — the platform gets smarter as the field uses it.
This walkthrough
Confirm direction with John & Roger.
Flagship slice
Restore one crown-jewel article + build one centaur exercise end-to-end.
The pilot
Run it in a live Skills Practicum cohort; measure against the rubric.
The commons
Open-release the curriculum + platform for any school to adopt.
What we're asking of you today
- Is this the right direction? — the layered opus, the practicum, the centaur model, open & MIT.
- What must be in the Book — which articles & ideas are the non-negotiable core of the canon?
- The flagship — which single skill or Midstate exercise should we build first, as the proof?
- Names on the door — how do you both want to be represented in a work that carries your legacy?
Your read on each pillar.
Every reaction and inline comment stays connected to the decision it informs.
THE PROOF · 8 decision prompts captured in one place
Two ways to give feedback as we walk through: tap a ✎ pencil beside any section or card to leave a comment tied to that spot, and/or set an overall reaction per pillar below. Everything gathers in ✎ Comments (bottom-right) → Copy all for Damien to paste back into the chat.